Liberal Jack Conway Announces He's Running for Governor

Liberal Democrat and Kentucky attorney general Jack Conway has officially announced that he will run for governor in 2015.

Conway got crushed by conservative Republican Rand Paul in the 2010 Senate race, and is unlikely to do well in the race for governor after he refused to fulfil his duty as Kentucky attorney general by not appealing a court ruling which would force Kentucky to recognize and uphold homosexual 'marriages' from out of state.

Conservatives across the state were outraged when Conway revealed he supported the judicial overreach when a federal judge corruptly intervened and bypassed Kentucky law.

Just like Ashley Judd, Conway is wrong for this state, and we need to send a clear message to politicians that they will represent us when we elect them or we'll boot them out of office. Conway must be booted out of office for his disrespect of the people of Kentucky based upon his liberal beliefs and agenda.

When liberals like Conway refuse to support the Kentucky Constitution, how much more mischief will he engage in like Obama has, who has also ignored the Constitution of the United State by calling it a living document; meaning he can make it mean whatever he personally wants it to. 

The reason Conway refused to defend the people of Kentucky against this federal intrusion? He said he did it on moral grounds. So where does Conway get his morality when the Holy Scriptures and Jesus Christ say marriage is between a man and a woman?

This liberal, Democratic morality is only sin under the guise of a tolerance. There is nothing more intolerant than the liberals who continue to attack and attempt to destroy Western civilization which is build on Biblical principles.

Fortunately Conway exposed his immoral beliefs, and we must send him back to the private sector to get a real job and repent for sinning against God and the people of Kentucky.

Investigation of Ky. Democrat Group Widening

The investigation surrounding the scandal associated with Kentucky Democratic group Progress Kentucky is widening, as U.S. Capitol Police have joined the FBI concerning the unethical taping of a private campaign meeting held by Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and some of his aides.

With Progress Kentucky having alleged easy access to the meeting, it does generate questions as to where the Capitol Police were when members of the group were supposedly right outside the door taping the conversation.

This all assumes it was in fact taped outside the meeting room and not bugged from within. If it was bugged within, the consequences would probably be far graver for the participants in the recording of McConnell.

The Democrat front group released the recording to Mother Jones, which was then put online in audio and transcript form.

Kentucky's official Democratic newspaper, the increasingly irrelevant Louisville Courier-Journal, even attempted to make the content of the conversation the issue, rather than the illegal actions of Democratic operatives.

It was a meeting to deal with a possible Ashley Judd run, where the admitted mental health issues Judd in fact has had were discussed.

As Larue County Register has said in the past, the emotional and mental state of a U.S. Senator is not only relevant to the people of Kentucky, but vital to our interests. To discuss it is extremely important, and to act as if this is some type of poor behavior on the part of McConnell can't be seriously believed.

The Democratic Party of Kentucky has taken a serious blow, and now its most supportive media arm is trying to provide cover for the despicable actions of some of its members. Democrats in Kentucky know they could pay for this in the next election, and so are in some cases attempting to go on the offensive over an indefensible act by those in the Kentucky Democratic Party.

Does McConnell Bugging Show Kentucky Democrats Losing it?

There is a disturbing trend in the Kentucky Democratic Party that voters in the commonwealth need to look closely at, the latest being the bugging recording of the private conversation between Senator Mitch McConnell and aides as they planned how to respond to an Ashley Judd run if she opposed McConnell.

According to Jacob Conway, who had had the information about the bugging recording - having been told by two Democrat, liberal extremists from Progress Kentucky that they had secretly recorded the meeting - he came forward because "he didn't want the situation tarnishing the Democratic Party."

Too late Jacob, you and the Democratic Party in Kentucky are totally tarnished by this because you knew this information for some time, and only chose to release it when you saw the letters FBI associated with an investigation. You knew you would be pointed out as having received the information, which could have, and still may lead to, criminal charges.

After all, why did Democrat Jacob Conway not immediately expose this in order to "protect" the integrity of the Kentucky Democratic Party? His sudden concern is only self-interest ... probably as a result of being pressured by those in the Democratic Party whom saw where it would and will lead.

When added to the support many in the Kentucky Democratic Party had for Ashley Judd, including Democrat Governor Steve Beshear, who had no problem asserting she would be a formidable foe for McConnell, which as her dropping out of the race revealed, wasn't true at all. National Democrats attempted to force Judd on the people of Kentucky, with many Kentucky Democrats lining up as puppets to their national masters in support of Judd.

It was only after the realization she would get slaughtered by McConnell, which would result in state Democrats getting crushed in the next election, that they started backing off supporting the Hollywood liberal.

This is a trend in the Kentucky Democratic Party, as Beshear recently called the Christians in Kentucky dangerous over the freedom of religion bill he vetoed, but which was overridden by the Kentucky House and Senate.

The point is Democrats in Kentucky appear to be hiding their true beliefs until they manipulate the people of Kentucky into considering them representative of their values, which it is increasingly being revealed - they aren't.

As for the bugging recording of McConnell, Jacob Conway said he used to be friends with Shawn Reilly and Curtis Morrison, the two from Progress Kentucky who revealed to Conway they had bugged recorded McConnell and his aides secretly.

Why are they now being identified as former friends by Conway? When did the relationship between them end, and why? Was it when Conway realized he could be in big trouble? Why did Conway and the Democratic Party wait until they were caught before they let the information about this scandal be known?

Are we to believe Conway kept this secret and to himself; not telling anyone in the Kentucky Democratic Party about the breach in ethics? There is no doubt some in the Democratic Party knew about this besides Conway, and it'll be very interesting to see where the FBI may take the investigation.

I say this because there can be no doubt Conway was pressured by someone in the Democratic Party to come clean with the information so it wouldn't be traced back to the party. Otherwise he would have did nothing.

Again, there could be some self-interest here, as mentioned earlier concerning the FBI being called upon to investigate the situation. Nonetheless it's a surety Conway sought advice before going public with the revelation.

As to the conversation itself, it's actually not out of bounds at all, and the fact that Judd herself has revealed in her autobiography that she has been suicidal and had a mental breakdown is very pertinent to voters in Kentucky.

Why wouldn't the people of Kentucky want to know the psychological makeup of a person that is going to represent them, especially when it appears the person running for office has the potential to be mentally unstable? It's not only relevant, it's essential to know.

So the idea that talking about Judd concerning this matter is inappropriate is clearly wrongheaded. It is the job of opponents to point out weaknesses in their opposition so we can get as clear as picture as we can to make an informed decision.

When Ashley Judd put out feelers to see what the reaction would be, she lost all here right to privacy, as a person running for office no longer has the right to hide things that could be potentially detrimental to their successfully fulfilling their obligations to their constituents.

With surveillance tapes have been pulled by the FBI, and it won't be long before the public knows whether the two in question actually were standing outside the door of the meeting as alleged, or if there was in fact a bug planted in the office of McConnell. Either way, the Democrat group Progress Kentucky and its supporters are in big trouble.

It's troubling to see this face of the Kentucky Democratic Party being revealed and uncovered, and the people of Kentucky need to seriously send the Democrats a message in the next election that we're not liberals; we're not supportive of unauthorized bugging or taping of private conversations; and we're not a bunch of crazies because many of us follow the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Let's Hope Ashley Judd Runs Against McConnell for Senate Seat

The more people in Kentucky think about Ashley Judd running against Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, the more they are getting nervous if they're Democrats, and the more they're rejoicing if they're Republicans.

Even when her own mother and sister talk about Ashley, there is no love lost between them, and the allegations made by Judd against her mother especially points to an extremely flawed individual that would garner no sympathy at all from the majority of Kentucky voters she is not only in conflict with as far as values, but acts as if she is superior to in her comments about them and their work in the state.

For Democrats in Kentucky, some at first started salivating over the prospect of a Judd run against McConnell, because he's considered vulnerable against the right candidate. But as people examine Judd and her extreme comments, Democrats are starting to squirm because they see the complete disaster that Judd will be for them, as the national party, which is totally out of step with the people of Kentucky and their values, is pushing to make her the candidate they think can unseat McConnell.

That's a delusion generated from their sheltered existence in Washington, where they can't see anywhere in the country that wouldn't kneel to their wisdom and insight. In regard to Kentucky, there is such a wide chasm between someone like Judd and the people, that even committed, conservative Democrats would not vote for her. The national Democrats simply don't see how terrible she is viewed by Kentuckians.

It's worse than that though. The Kentucky Democrats will be strongly pressured to back Judd if she decides to run, and the party will be painted with her views, as well as Obama's, which will set the Kentucky Democratic Party back for years.

That election it would be a slaughter by the Republicans, who would get the vote in a way they haven't for some time in the state across numerous counties that have went Democrats' way recently.

The bottom line is the Senate race would be a national election, and there is no way a liberal like Judd could ever win in Kentucky.

We could even see a big rift in the Democratic Party of Kentucky because many of its leaders currently in office know they would be in extreme danger of being painted with the attributes of Judd, something many of them won't be able to escape.

Republicans on the other hand are more than hoping Judd will enter the race, as it's one of those once-in-a-lifetime opportunities that can change history.

The question is if the national Democrats will give this terrific gift to the Republicans or not. If they do, it'll be extremely difficult for many Democrats to back her, and will be extremely interesting to see how they respond.

No doubt this is great theater that will be played out on the national level. This is what terrifies Kentucky Democrats ... and it should. Once it starts to be covered in the mainstream media, there is no backing out.

The repercussions could be extraordinary, swift, and ominous. It's amazing that many top Democrats such as Governor Steve Beshear are giving her praise. That means national leaders are already pressing hard for Judd's run. What an amazing debacle is about to happen.

Ashley Judd, Beshear, and "Raping" of Mountains by Kentucky Coal Miners

It's bizarre to see Kentucky Democratic Governor Steve Beshear cuddle up to anti-Kentucky, Hollywood elitist liberal Ashley Judd, who represents everything Kentucky isn't. Doesn't he know the consequences of what appears to be his growing support for this extremist?

Below is an example of this fanatic equating the coal miners of Kentucky as rapists because they're moving some rock off the mountains to get at the coal God placed there. Godless people like Judd don't understand the "earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof," so the false idea that the earth is our mother is an attack on Christianity, which says New Jerusalem is our mother, and she is in the heavenlies.

Anyone calling mining rape is a candidate for needed counselling. At least her mother and sister are getting that help. She needs to join them or forever remain in denial of her deep emotional problems.

Think of it. She is an outrageous supporter of Planned Parenthood, which has its roots squarely in the racist vision of Margaret Sanger, who pushed murderous abortions as a way to control the population of black Americans, among others.

Maybe that's why radical liberal groups such as Progress Kentucky support Judd, as it has attacked the ethnicity of the wife of Mitch McConnell, who is Asian. The historical racists in America have always primarily been Democrats, as history totally confirms.

So Judd doesn't mind the butchering of babies in the womb, but loses sleep during the night over moving around of rock and dirt on Kentucky mountains.

Also extremely fishy and something Judd hasn't been called out on is why her husband left her right before she made it known she is serious about making a run for the Senate seat held by McConnell. It appears she was going to have it her way or nothing. That kind of fanaticism and hunger for power is dangerous; something radicals like Obama live for.

Finally, Judd isn't even a resident of Kentucky, as she resides in Tennessee, but wants to force herself on Kentucky by re-establishing residency after years of being absent.

It also seems there is growing pressure from national, radical liberal Democrats for the Democrats of Kentucky to toe the line, hold their noses, and get out of the way of a Ashley Judd run if that's what the spoiled little child wants.

Even the comments made by those outside of Kentucky show there is little real understanding of the people living here and their conservative values. Ashley Judd is a slap in the face of those values, and must and will be soundly rejected by people in the state if she chooses to run for public office.

Democrats in Kentucky know they need to keep their distance from Judd, as when and if she runs, and when she is soundly defeated, the wrath of the voters in the Commonwealth will turn upon the cowardly Democrats who offered her aid and comfort.

Rand Paul Says Judd Doesn't Represent Kentucky

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul said on CNN's "State of the Union" that Tennessee resident and extreme liberal, Ashley Judd, "doesn't really represent Kentucky," meaning the values of the majority of people residing in the state.

Judd isn't even a resident of Kentucky, and would have to move and establish residence here to even run against Mitch McConnell.

The national mainstream media are attempting to make this look like it would be a close race, with Judd having a good chance to even unseat McConnell. While McConnell could be vulnerable, the politically extreme Judd, who has held nothing back as to her views, would find it impossible to backtrack on her support of abortion, planned parenthood, and opposition to coal, among others.

Some of those would be strengths in some states, but in Kentucky they're guaranteed to turn people against you.

Another disconnect from national pundits is the idea that McConnell would be viewed as anti-women in the state, even though Judd would in fact have to deal with that reality, as abortion and planned parenthood are considered anti-woman and anti-family.

So when the mainstream media outlets try to make this look like a race Judd could win, they are basing that assumption and wishful thinking upon their worldview, not that held by the vast majority of Kentuckians.

Now if there was a strong Tea Party-type candidate that arose, McConnell would be in some serious trouble. At this time such a candidate hasn't emerged.

Beshear Going to Bed with Judd?

The idea of Tennessee resident Ashley Judd representing the people of Kentucky is pathetic, as this Hollywood elitest and Obama sycophant is against everything the vast majority of Kentuckians stand for.

Judd isn't simply a liberal, she's radical to the core, and has backed Obama in almost everything he has done.

So when Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear said she would be "an effective and formidable" challenger to Republican U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell, you know forces outside of Kentucky are pressing the Kentucky Democratic party to line up behind this potential candidate.

We'll make Beshear and the Democrats pay in the next election if they don't have the courage to stand up against the outrageous Obama political machine, which uses strong-arm tactics to get its way, as it has when Obama was in Chicago. We don't and won't have Chicago politics in Kentucky, and that's what someone like Judd represents.

Look already at how the Democrats of Kentucky have backpedaled of the despicable Judd. Initially they were all running from her with the exception of a couple of Democrats residing in safe, liberal Kentucky strongholds.

Democrats of Kentucky know if Judd runs, and after she is defeated, that there will be huge payback for supporting her. So when Beshear offers support for Judd, you know his national masters are starting to pull his strings.

This is not good for Kentucky, and we need to let Beshear know we won't have a non-Kentucky resident take up residence for the purpose of running for the Senate.

While it may be legal if Judd takes up residence in Kentucky again, it shows the obsession a radical liberal like her has. Remember when Hillary Clinton did the same when she moved from Arkansas to New York?

So let your representatives know we have no interest in this type of person who is opposed to most of what we stand for to represent us. If they don't resist this encroachment on the people of Kentucky, we'll vote in those that will.

Kentucky House Panel Democrats Vote for Death Again

Democrats in Kentucky should hold their heads in shame as the Democrat-dominated House panel voted against requirements that women seeking abortions would have to to view an ultrasound, while another bill was rejected by the Democrats which would have required a face-to-face consultation with a doctor or medical representative before having an abortion.

When you look at the most vulnerable citizens of Kentucky, living babies in the womb of their mothers, and the fact that the Democratic Party of Kentucky refuses to allow women to receive more information to make such a life-ending decision, it's among the worst forms of child abuse; and worse that it's state-sanctioned child abuse and murder.

As Rep. Robert Benvenuti, R-Lexington, said, even if you're a proponent of abortion, the idea of not allowing women to receive the most accurate information available to them is ludicrous. He also notes that abortion is the only so-called medical procedure in Kentucky that doesn't involve informed consent.

Here's how the House Democrats voted against all attempts to limit abortion. They voted against House Bill 23, which would prohibit insurance plans on the health benefit exchange to pay for abortions. Also defeated was House Bill 251, which would require doctors who work in abortion clinics to have local hospital privileges and be board certified; House Bill 132, which would prohibit abortions if a fetal heart beat is detected; and House Bill 412, which would ban abortions earlier than 20 weeks, among other related issues.

Especially troubling is the Obama tactics being implemented by Kentucky Democrats concerning House Bill 23. Governor Beshear has stated that the health benefit exchange would not cover abortions. For these Democrats to vote for the exchange to pay for abortions is a revelation of their hatred of life and inability to be trusted. I wonder what Beshear will say about this?

It also gives a glimpse into the horror that is Ashley Judd, who makes many of these Democrats look like staunch conservatives.

Kentucky residents need to start voting the untrustworthy Democrats out until they start respecting life and the values of the majority of Kentucky residents.

Obsessive Ashley Judd Continues Pushing Herself on Kentucky Democrats

There's no doubt the majority of Kentucky Democrats wish that extreme liberal Ashley Judd will just shut up and stay in Tennessee where she lives, rather than continue to hound them about a run against Republican Senator Mitch McConnell.

No other term describes Judd best, because she does not have deep community ties in Kentucky, outside of being born here, as a carpetbagger. To even run for office she would be required to re-establish a residence in the state.

Democrats in Kentucky are trying to run for cover as Judd forces herself upon the party, as they know if McConnell soundly defeats her, as he undoubtedly will if she runs for the Senate seat he holds, she could drag down any Democrat outside the safe confines of the few liberal strongholds that exist in Kentucky.

Only the Democrats living in these safe districts are willing to support a Judd run. The others know they will be painted with the politically extreme Judd, and could get hammered as a result.

It appears the reason no Democrat has risen to challenge McConnell is because they are apparently waiting for a Judd decision. To me this is a big mistake. Someone should step forward and steal her thunder and make a statement that they want her to remain in Tennessee, rather than come to Kentucky and destroy much of the gains the more conservative arm of the Democratic Party have made.

Democrats are stupidly starstruck, and if they base decisions on the reporting of the national mainstream news media, they'll be in for a shock when Kentuckians overwhelmingly vote for McConnell against this Hollywood liberal elitist.

Kentucky Tea Party Says No to Ashley Judd, Racist Supporters

A racist attack on the wife of Kentucky Republican Senator Mitch McConnell has liberal extremist Ashley Judd reeling and offering condemnations of a group that strongly supports her running against McConnell in the next election.

The very idea by mainstream media dinosaurs in Kentucky that the Kentucky Tea Party are becoming allies of a Judd run are not only ludicrous, but outright fabrications.

There is no such alliance, and as much as Mitch McConnell has resisted siding on some important issues of the Tea Party, he looks more like Ron Paul when compared with Ashley Judd, who stands for almost everything the people of Kentucky reject.

What people are missing is while the media have partially demonized McConnell on the national level, that is far from translating to the state level, where the clueless media have little understanding of the conservative and libertarian-leaning populace.

As much as there is a general dislike for McConnell, it isn't near the level of disgust at Ashley Judd, who is nothing more than a Hollywood liberal outsider attempting to use her celebrity to buy an election. That's of course assuming she decides to run, which it looks like there is a good chance of happening.

Democrats in the state are extremely nervous because of the fact they can easily be painted with the extremist liberal brand Judd represents, which could result in a number of them being ousted from their positions. Most have already strongly suggested that they don't want Judd to run.

As for the racist Progress Kentucky, there is nothing the Tea Party and what they represent have in common, other than attempting to use the national media-induced hatred of McConnell as a rallying point. The problem is if all they can come up with is a negative, they are completely useless, as it's not enough to go against someone, there must be a viable alternative. With Judd that's not even close to being a true alternative for Kentucky, and so it leaves them with a negative message, colored with such hatred (not opposition) to McConnell, that it'll even suggest his Asian wife is a stronger supporter of China (she is actually from Taiwan) than she is of America because of her racial background.

What Progressive Kentucky is attempting to do is provide what appears to be a legitimate Tea Party alternative to McConnell, such as Matt Bevin, knowing if somehow they can knock off McConnell, they'll then throw their full support behind Judd.

Even in that scenario Judd could be beaten, but the odds of becoming a Senator from Kentucky improves.

But the liberal, Democrat-backing Progressive Kentucky shows the type of person we would get in the Obama clone Ashley Judd. The Kentucky Tea Party and Republicans have no interest in the attempt to be taken over by dictators like them who couldn't legitimately represent our interests.

After all, look at the strong-arm tactics used by Democrats against Democrats to force Obamacare on us all.

Ashley Judd for Comic Relief 2014

Since political radical Ashley Judd, who represents everything the vast majority of the people of Kentucky oppose, is a celebrity, she is commanding silly and ridiculous attention to what will probably be a run against Republican incumbent Mitch McConnell.

Her latest publicity stunt was to meet with the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in Washington, D.C., in an attempt to make her appear to be a "serious' candidate to represent the people of Kentucky. It's largely a joke, and one that will be exposed if she does decide to run.

She also had dinner with prominent Democrats from Kentucky, who are extremely nervous about the strong possibility Judd could bring the Democrat party in Kentucky crashing down around her. It's very likely she could and will.

Unfortunately, her celebrity status has pushed Kentucky Democrats into a corner, although some have and should resist showing support for this extreme potential candidate.

I hope Judd does enter the raise, as it'll be hilarious to see her and the Kentucky Democrats attempt to make her look legitimate in the eyes of the people of the Commonwealth.

At the same time it'll be entertaining to see the other Democrats who don't believe at all in what she represents distance themselves from her.

While national Democrats think they have a great candidate, they obviously don't understand Kentucky and its people in any way. Ashley Judd could cause more damage to the Democratic Party in Kentucky than any other force seen in a long time.

In other words, this is going to be a hoot and much comic relief for what would otherwise an election that would be a repetition of past elections.

Republicans will love this while Democrats will be chewing their fingernails. I don't care what dishonest and corrupt pollsters say, Judd has went to political bed with Obama, and if she tries to use the "outsider" card as the way to battle against McConnell, how hard is it to paint her with the fact she hasn't lived in Kentucky for years, and is among the most extreme liberals that could be put in a political race in one of the most conservative states.

Like I said. This is going to be a lot of fun and entertainment, but in the end I don't think the Democrats will be happy if she decides to run, no matter how hard the media tries to make her their darling.

Is Matthew Bevin a Ky. Tea Party Pretender?

Residents of Kentucky need to look hard at anyone laying claim to a Tea Party label, as many pretenders have emerged, which has undermined the vibrancy of the movement and resulted in watering down the message, as it has been blended with other elements not representative of what those of the Tea Party believe.

That's the way we must approach Louisville businessman Matthew Bevin, who is being touted as a Tea Party alternative to incumbent Republican Senator Mitch McConnell.

The term Tea Party is being too loosely used at this time, and embracing the label does nothing to prove a person embraces the core beliefs of the movement.

We must realize the media in big cities in Kentucky are liberal, as they mostly are in all big cities of America. So when they anoint someone as a viable candidate representing the Tea Party, we must be resistant to the assertion and examine carefully the beliefs and character of the individual they're trying to foist on us.

For Bevin, he may or may not be a legitimate Tea Party candidate, but the liberal media outlets want so badly to rid Kentucky of McConnell, they'll do just about anything to disrupt the process and if they can, divide the Republican Party.

The Democrats are also attempting to do the same thing, disingenuously offering financial support for a Tea Party challenger to McConnell. Again, this is a way to attempt to divide the loyalties of the Republican Party so the terrible and ultra liberal Ashley Judd has a chance to become a Senator from Kentucky.

While I'm not a particular fan of Mitch McConnell, give me ten of him before an Ashley Judd, who would vote against and misrepresent the vast majority of Kentucky citizens. She's aggressively and unashamedly back Obama, and there is very little those of us in Kentucky agree with concerning the policies and ideology of this president. Judd is just as bad or worse.

In regard to Bevin, concerns have already been raised over his use of state funds in Connecticut to rebuild a factory he owned that burnt in a fire last year.

United Kentucky Tea Party’s John Kemper asked the question, “Would this business owner taking taxpayer money to rebuild his business after a fire be considered to support limited government, free-markets, fiscal responsibility? What happened to his business insurance coverage?” 

That's not to say Bevin's couldn't emerge as a strong candidate, just that we all must weigh whether he really embraces Tea Party and Kentucky values, or he's a Trojan Horse propped up to fall if he were to dislodge McConnell, but be trounced by an anti-Kentuckian liberal like Ashley Judd.

This doesn't just relate to Bevin, but to any potentially strong Tea Party candidate that emerges.

We need to hear a lot more than a label being attached to someone before we consider them someone who truly represents our values and beliefs.

Ashley Judd and Ky.s Only Religion Being Basketball

In what is sure to spark the ire of the many Christians residing in Kentucky, former Kentucky Democrat party chairman Jonathan Miller and Ashley Judd supporter said, "There is only one organized religion in this state, and it's Kentucky basketball. She's a very visible fan." Miller was referring to her living in Tennessee and her extreme liberalism.

He also bizarrely added that "...she is identified by Kentuckians as a native and solid Kentuckian." That may seem the case in Miller's confused and distorted extreme and cloistered liberal world he and Judd reside in, but no, most of those living in Kentucky don't think of Judd as being a real Kentuckian, as she has brazenly rejected the values of the vast majority of people living in the commonwealth while hiding away in Tennessee.

Judd is tied lock, stock, and barrel to Obama, and the idea that the policies of Barack Obama, which Judd wholly agrees with and backs, is representative of residents of Kentucky, is laughable at best, and an outright lie at worst.

There's a reason Barack Obama lost all but four counties in Kentucky in the last presidential election. It's also why Obama didn't even bother to campaign in the state: liberals aren't wanted or accepted here, and Ashley Judd is as liberal an anti-Kentucky values as they come. Nothing but lies and dishonesty could ever change that, because it's not a perception but an absolute reality.

Miller's assertion about the only organized religion practiced in Kentucky being basketball, points to the godless world view of people like him and Ashley Judd. It wasn't a slip of the tongue. Liberals like Judd and Miller actually believe these things.

To think he is painting Judd as a religious person because basketball is the god of Kentucky residents only shows how far out he and Judd are in discerning what the people of Kentucky stand for.

Kentuckians are going to drink the kool aid, and this is why the vast majority of Democrats in the state are distancing themselves from Judd, as they know they could be painted with the disastrous liberal label and world view Judd has, which could result in a route of the Kentucky Democrats in the next election.

The strategy to hide and obscure Judd's radical views is to try to run as a Washington outsider rather than the extremist she is. We in Kentucky see through it, and if she brazenly decides to run for the Senate, we'll make her and the other Democrats in the state pay for the affront to Kentucky and its people of the Christian faith.

Kentucky Democrats Fleeing from Ashley Judd Senate Run

Kentucky Democrats are running for cover and experiencing a little bit of trembling fear as well, as extreme liberal actress Ashley Judd is still considering the possibility of making a run at the Senate seat held by Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

It's not that they believe McConnell is vulnerable against a candidate like Judd, as he isn't, but it's that Judd could cause Kentucky Democrats to be labeled and painted with the same brush as Judd, and that could cause a lot of their recent success in the state to be undone.

While the national media is backing the possibility, state Democrats know the probable and potential disaster Judd will be to them.

The overall problem is Judd has politically went to bed with Obama, and it would take a local and state election to the national level, meaning it would be Obama's policies against the conservative values of Kentucky residents. Judd wouldn't have a chance there, and as mentioned, could cause some serious damage to the Democratic Party in Kentucky if they are painted with the brush of Judds progressive politics and beliefs.

For now her trial balloon has frozen the rest of the Democratic field. Until she decides one way or another, it's unlikely another Democrat will throw their hat in the field to run against McConnell.

I find this odd because Judd isn't really that much of a threat. And even with her celebrity, which would work against her in Kentucky because everyone knows what a radical liberal she is, it's unlikely she'll gain much traction in the Commonwealth. That's because she's used her celebrity to get media attention which she won't be able to hide behind when her out-of-touch views are revealed for what they are.

What will be very interesting is how the outcome would reveal where Kentucky is at as far as it handling radical celebrities like Judd. In that sense it would be a learning experience for all, but possibly at the expense of setting the Democratic Party in the state reeling for years.

It can't be spoken any clearer than it already has: the Democrats don't want her running, and would prefer she stay in Tennessee look for acting jobs.

Kentucky Tea Party: Beware of Democrats Bearing Gifts

The idea that Democrats in Kentucky are worried about Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), getting re-elected, and want to work together with Republicans and Tea Party representatives is a joke.

This is nothing other than the old but effective tactic of dividing and conquering. If the Tea Party members go along with this, they will be rightly tarnished as an arm of the Democratic Party of Kentucky; they would lose credibility and effectiveness.

More importantly, what Democrats are attempting to do is create the illusion that the Republican Party has lost its vision, and they want to exploit that by appearing to be concerned over the situation, but once McConnell was removed from the Senate race, would aggressively attack the candidate they originally talked Republicans and Tea Party representatives into backing.

In case you think I'm a supporter of Mitch McConnell, I'm not, my loyalties lie with the Tea Party, assuming they remain on message.

But at this point in time, unless the Tea Party puts forth a strong candidate, it would probably be better to re-elect Mitch McConnell than to have a person lacking character and not representing Kentucky values, such as actress Ashley Judd, who has been throwing out trial balloons all over the place to see if she would have any real chance of becoming a Senator from Kentucky.

It's best to spread the message of liberty around and build up at the grass roots level than to accept any money from the liberal, Democrat machine that has shown in its major representative Barack Obama, that it doesn't matter if you lie, cheat or steal to get your way, as long as you get it.

The Kentucky Tea Party should focus on the long-term and stay away from these types of proposed alliances which will rob it of its soul.

In truth the Democrats know of the potential of the Tea Party in Kentucky and around the nation, and are attempting to co-opt it by appearing to be friends with them against a common enemy. Mitch McConnell, because of some of his wrong-headed decisions, has become their poster boy for doing this.

Don't be taken in by it Tea Party. To be successful, we must not engage and enter into short-term strategies which have no long-term benefit to us. Removing Mitch McConnell may send a message - and talk of it already has - but to look at it from a larger point of view and longer time frame, it's really not that important.

Liberal Democrats view Obama as their chance of a lifetime, and they're doing everything they can to replace anyone that may oppose his repugnant agenda. Could you imagine abortionist and liberal Ashley Judd representing the people of Kentucky? Mitch McConnell looks like a saint compared to that Hollywood nut job.

Forget the idea of attempting to get rid of Mitch McConnell as some type of major goal and strategy. If it can be done with a strong liberty-minded candidate, I'm all for it; one that could defeat any candidate the Democratic Party of Kentucky could throw at them. But to get rid of McConnell for the purpose of punishing him, and them punishing the people of Kentucky with someone like Ashley Judd, would set the Tea Party back for years, and isn't worth the effort for some temporary satisfaction.

Don't reach across the aisle to the Democrats. As bad as Mitch McConnell is in some areas, he does have some conservative values that line up with the people of Kentucky, something most Democrats don't have.

Notice all the Democrats running around Kentucky and blabbing to mainstream media outlets how they back Obama in his radical agendas, including attempts to strip us of our 2nd Amendment rights. To vote for that party is to vote against liberty and ourselves. Don't do it.

Obama, Abortion-Loving Ashley Judd Considering Kentucky Run Against Mitch McConnell

Representing everything the vast majority of people in Kentucky oppose, liberal actress Ashley Judd is throwing out some trial balloons to see if she has a chance if she decides to run against U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell in 2014.

A rabid supporter of Democrat Barack Obama, who is in opposition to almost everything Kentucky residents believe, Judd expects us to not view her radical believes and agenda and vote for her because she starred in a few movies.

She is a strong supporter of killing babies via abortion, and opposes animal control such as practiced in Alaska concerning wolves, blabbing about the practice of killing them in order to maintain control of the caribou population in Alaska, even though many of the residents count on a healthy population for food.

Judd apparently believes it's more important to control baby populations by killing them than it is to kill wolves so people can eat. She's also communicated with Democrat Kentucky governor Steve Beshear concerning homeless animals in Kentucky, calling upon him to protect them via overbearing enforcement of the Humane Shelter Law. No protection of babies for this actress and out-of-state woman, but she sure is worried about the animals of this world instead.

The idea of this Hollywood representative attempting to run and represent the people of Kentucky, even though she has almost no credibility or affinity with what we believe and want in a lawmaker, is despicable.

Let's send her a message right away that we don't even want to hear her named mentioned in regard to Kentucky. She no longer lives here and is completely out of touch with us. She's so far left she goes past the last house (referring to horror film of the same name).

A concerted liberal, Democrat-led attack has begun on the people of Kentucky, and we must oppose this vigorously if we don't want our state to change its unique character. Democrat John Yarmuth has already joined Barack Obama in his fight against the 2nd amendment, and he needs to be voted out of office as soon as possible.

All of this is to say they think they see weakness in the conservative and libertarian bent of the people of Kentucky. We need to send them a clear message that they have read us wrong.

If people like Steve Bashear won't represent who we are and speak up against these radicals, we need to send him packing and get someone who will. It doesn't matter if he has gotten a few businesses to come to Kentucky if he and his Democrat, liberal, progressive cohorts attempt to persuade us to sell our selves in response. We must not do it. We will not do it.